Reliability and validity research

Psychologists consider three types of consistency: over time (test-retest reliability), across items (internal consistency), and across different researchers (inter-rater reliability).

Reliability and Validity - SAGE Research Methods

Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research Abstract The use of reliability and validity are common in quantitative research and now it is.


For example, when there is a cultural problem perceived within a standardized test, researchers interview representatives of the affected test group and then go over each question of the assessment with each participant asking why a certain answer was given.Assessing convergent validity requires collecting data using the measure.Reliability is consistency across time (test-retest reliability), across items (internal consistency), and across researchers (interrater reliability).It is not the same as mood, which is how good or bad one happens to be feeling right now.If you are using field notes, be sure to make specific observations.Although this measure would have extremely good test-retest reliability, it would have absolutely no validity.

Like face validity, content validity is not usually assessed quantitatively.The finger-length method of measuring self-esteem, on the other hand, seems to have nothing to do with self-esteem and therefore has poor face validity.An explanation of reliability and validity of measures is presented.We have already considered one factor that they take into account—reliability.Like test-retest reliability, internal consistency can only be assessed by collecting and analyzing data.Instead, it is assessed by carefully checking the measurement method against the conceptual definition of the construct.On the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, people who agree that they are a person of worth should tend to agree that that they have a number of good qualities.


Chiang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Reliability and Validity - Video & Lesson Transcript

They suggest that the use of numbers in the process of recording and analyzing observations.Writing a Research Report in American Psychological Association (APA) Style.The assessment of reliability and validity is an ongoing process.There is content validity, criterion validity and construct validity.Issues of research reliability and validity need to be addressed in methodology chapter in a concise manner.Development of these guides began in 1993, when the original Online Writing Center was developed for campus use at Colorado State University.

But if it were found that people scored equally well on the exam regardless of their test anxiety scores, then this would cast doubt on the validity of the measure.T hese related research issues ask us to consider whether we are studying what we think we are studying and whether the measures we use are.Emic refers to looking at a behavior with the perspective from inside the system using local concepts.Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings Mohammad Zohrabi (Corresponding author) University of Tabriz, Iran.For example, self-esteem is a general attitude toward the self that is fairly stable over time.Research validity in surveys relates to the extent at which the survey measures right elements that need to be measured.For example, there are 252 ways to split a set of 10 items into two sets of five.

Dealing with different types of validity is what makes establishing validity in qualitative research very difficult.Validity of an assessment is the degree to which it measures what it is supposed to measure.

This is not the same as reliability, which is the extent to which a.

Validity and Reliability of Research Essay - 453 Words

Most people would expect a self-esteem questionnaire to include items about whether they see themselves as a person of worth and whether they think they have good qualities.In qualitative research, it is whether or not you get a true picture of the process or behavior being examined.

Tips for Developing and Testing Questionnaires/Instruments

Then assess its internal consistency by making a scatterplot to show the split-half correlation (even- vs. odd-numbered items).An example of content validity could be measuring the knowledge gained by a student teacher after observing expert teachers and then teaching for a semester.Construct validity is the most difficult type of validity to establish.Quantitative methods include using test scores, number counts and other procedures that use hard numbers to make assessments.For example, if a researcher conceptually defines test anxiety as involving both sympathetic nervous system activation (leading to nervous feelings) and negative thoughts, then his measure of test anxiety should include items about both nervous feelings and negative thoughts.

Figure 5.2 Test-Retest Correlation Between Two Sets of Scores of Several College Students on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Given Two Times a Week Apart.

Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability

Explore the research methods terrain, read definitions of key terminology, and discover content relevant to your research methods journey.Kirk and Miller define what is -- and what is not -- qualitative research.Criteria can also include other measures of the same construct.